Connect with us

Uncategorized

Capria VC wants to back two more African Series A startups with $1-$3 million each

Published

on

Capria VC, a global venture firm with $207 million in assets under management, runs a unique model for investing in emerging markets by backing startups and local fund managers. Globally, it has invested in 17 fund managers, giving it indirect exposure to nearly 400 portfolio companies, while directly investing in only 41 startups.

Capria’s African partner firms are Global Ventures, Lateral Frontiers and Atlantica Ventures. “This model is powerful because it gives us broad access to market insights. It’s a huge data set, which benefits both us and our portfolio companies,” Mobola da Silva, the Africa partner at Capria, told TechCabal.

She joined Capria in 2023 initially as a venture partner before transitioning to a partner in 2024 and relocating from Lagos to Nairobi to strengthen Capria’s on-ground presence on the continent.

Before joining Capria, she spent 14 years working at the intersection of venture capital and emerging markets and held senior roles at the Draper Richards Kaplan Foundation, the uMunthu Fund, and Alitheia Capital.  

“The common theme (of my career) is deploying capital into the most promising opportunities and backing founders best positioned to scale transformative businesses,” da Silva said. 

Capria invests $1-3 million in startups with capital also reserved for follow-on investments. The firm has directly invested in six African startups, focusing on sectors driving large-scale impact and innovation, like fintech, agtech, HRtech/jobtech, edtech, healthtech, and B2B SaaS. 

“These industries represent key areas where technology and entrepreneurship can create transformative solutions in emerging markets,” da Silva explained. 

It counts Moniepoint, Paymob, and Seamless HR in its direct portfolio. In MAX, it invested alongside Global Ventures, one of its partner firms. In its indirect portfolio, it is exposed to LipaLater, Klasha, and Figorr, among others in Africa. 

Venture capital firms are often split between investing teams and support teams that guide portfolio startups. Besides its unique investing model, Capria also has a unique support approach. It has an in-house AI team comprising four developers, founding partner Will Poole—an ex-tech entrepreneur with sector expertise—and a member of its support team.

“The AI team is a resource available to all our portfolio companies. Any company can approach us and say, “We’re thinking of implementing AI in this way, but we have challenges—how can you help?” They don’t have to use the AI team, but it’s an option. Of course, there’s some prioritisation. The team can’t work with all companies simultaneously, so they phase projects depending on workload,” da Silva said. 

TechCabal spoke to da Silva to understand the firm’s investment thesis and plans for Africa. 

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

How do you source and identify promising opportunities in such a fragmented market? 

At Capria, we prioritise a set of core elements when evaluating startups. We look for exceptional teams, strong revenue traction, and compelling unit economics that demonstrate long-term viability. A startup’s ‘right to win’ in its market is critical, along with an asset-light model that leverages technology—particularly applied AI—to drive scale and efficiency. Additionally, we focus on companies operating in large and growing markets, ensuring they have the potential for significant market impact.

Which qualities do you look for in founding teams beyond their product or service, particularly regarding resilience and cultural fit for African markets?  

At Capria, we evaluate founders and founding teams based on several key factors like founder-market fit. We prioritise alignment between a founder’s skills, experience, and personal qualities with the market’s needs. While this is a strong preference, we may make exceptions for serial entrepreneurs with a proven track record.

We also look at their soft skills and coachability. Founders must demonstrate humility and the ability to accept feedback, as this is critical for long-term success. For younger founders, we assess strategic thinking, domain knowledge, passion, and grit—often validated through third-party references early in our diligence process.

We also prefer diverse founding teams but, at a minimum, expect founders to be deeply connected within their industry ecosystem.

What’s your due diligence process, from initial pitch review to deeper market and team assessments?

We have a multi-step process that includes initial screening after the first conversation with the founder, first-level investment committee (IC) approval, due diligence (commercial, financial, legal, and technology), final IC approval, investment documentation, signing, and deal execution. Each step has specific tasks we follow to ensure we run a comprehensive and thorough process.

How do you structure investments in Africa? 

We use several strategies to structure investments in Africa to mitigate the effects of macro risks like portfolio diversification. Capria diversifies investments across different sectors, stages, and regions within Africa, helping spread risk and reduce the impact of volatility in any one area.

We also collaborate with local partners who have deep market knowledge and experience is invaluable. They provide insights into navigating the specific challenges and opportunities of the local market. 

Capria emphasises that strong corporate governance and financial controls within portfolio companies are crucial. This helps ensure transparency, accountability, and efficient use of capital, which are essential in uncertain environments. In some instances, mechanisms such as liquidation preferences or anti-dilution clauses protect against unfavourable market conditions or company performance. 

You focus on Series A and beyond, avoiding seed-stage startups. Why is that?

Our sweet spot is Series A. We rarely invest at seed—definitely not pre-seed—but we’ve made some exceptions.

Is it because seed-stage startups are riskier, especially in Africa?

Yes, largely. At Series A, while a startup isn’t entirely de-risked, certain risks are reduced. By then, a company should have demonstrated product-market fit and a scalable, repeatable business model. Seed-stage startups are still figuring those things out. Series A funding is meant to scale a proven model. That said, we do invest in seed through some of our India-focused funds, so we’re not completely unfamiliar with it. But for our Africa fund, this is our strategy.

What’s your ideal startup?

Our strategy is Series A tech-enabled companies in key sectors like fintech (which makes up ~50% of our Africa portfolio), agtech, jobtech and B2B SaaS. We also look for a strong founding team, a robust business model and a large, growing total addressable market.

Additionally, we focus on startups applying AI in meaningful ways. To clarify, we don’t invest in AI companies building large language models (LLMs) or AI-native apps. We invest in tech companies—like fintech or jobtech—that use AI to enhance their businesses. We believe applied AI can be transformative in emerging markets.

To what extent do LPs influence your investment strategy regarding sectors or geographies?

The investment strategy is defined by the fund manager. LP influence is minimal.

How do you decide which local partners to invest in, and how do those partnerships work?

Capria has a network of fund managers across the four regions where we invest. These are our core investment partners—the funds we invest alongside when backing companies. Beyond that, we also have relationships with other investors in the ecosystem whom we trust and whose strategies align with ours. We co-invest with them occasionally, even if we haven’t directly invested in their funds.

We take this co-investment approach because local fund managers have key advantages. They are on the ground, present in the markets. They have a deeper understanding of the ecosystem. They have strong networks. So, investing alongside them makes sense for these reasons.

Additionally, I lead our Africa team, which sources and executes deals independently. We don’t rely solely on co-investments.

Which countries do you prioritise, and why?

We focus on key tech hubs where startup activity is concentrated. In Africa, that means Nigeria in West Africa, Kenya in East Africa, and Egypt in North Africa. We don’t invest in Southern Africa at all.

Why not? 

It’s simply a strategic decision. South Africa has a different market structure compared to East and West Africa. Its VC ecosystem is also more mature. We decided our capabilities and expertise were better suited to East and West Africa.

How have currency devaluations and rising interest rates affected deal flow and valuations in African tech? 

Currency volatility has increased FX risk, making geo-diversification, foreign currency income, and localised expenses essential for startups. Higher borrowing costs have made debt financing less accessible, leading to longer deal cycles and more stringent investment criteria.

Rising interest rates have weakened debt affordability, reducing investor appetite for high-risk early-stage investments. 

While these macroeconomic factors present challenges, startups with robust financial strategies, operational resilience, and strong leadership teams continue to attract investment and position themselves for sustainable growth. 

What is your overall outlook on investor sentiment in Africa, given current global economic conditions?

The 2025 venture capital outlook in Africa remains optimistic despite global economic challenges. Both start-ups and investors have become more disciplined, focusing on strong business fundamentals and a realistic path to growth and profitability. The African startup ecosystem is maturing, with increasing capital deployment supported by repeat entrepreneurs, local investment funds, and growing global investor interest. 

Applied AI and agentic AI will be game-changing for startups in resource-constrained environments like Africa. While challenges exist, Africa remains a viable destination for VC investment due to its demographics, technological innovation, and unmet opportunities.

Could you share an example of a startup where your fund played a key role in catalysing growth or achieving a notable milestone or exit?

Specific examples of how we have supported our portfolio companies in Africa include:

Fundraising Support: We’ve helped several portfolio companies secure follow-on funding from other investors, leveraging our relationships both within and outside Africa

AppliedAI Support: Our in-house AI team has worked with our portfolio companies to develop and test AI use cases, which include developing new products that contribute to revenue growth and significantly improve an operational function, leading to lower operational expenses. 

Sourcing Talent: We leverage our deep networks in the region to help a portfolio company source high-quality talent for key roles.

Which regulatory hurdles have you encountered in different African markets, and how did you navigate them?  

While we mostly avoid highly regulated sectors, regulation is not entirely avoidable. We try to minimise the risks wherever possible through deal structuring, co-investing with experienced/local investors, and investing in resilient founders/business models. 

How do market fragmentation and infrastructural deficits affect your investment decisions?  

We look for companies with robust business models that can thrive despite these challenges. Technology plays a big role in overcoming infrastructural deficits. We also invest in markets with the largest start-up ecosystems, which tend to be the larger, more advanced markets in the continent.

How do you adapt your investment approach to various cultural, linguistic, and economic contexts?  

We have team members on the ground in most of the markets where we invest and the majority of our team are also native to those countries.  We also invest alongside other local fund managers. 

How do you measure and track the performance of portfolio companies?

We track a range of financial and non-financial metrics that are specific to each company, sector and/or region.  We get metrics from portfolio companies monthly, and we do portfolio reporting on a quarterly basis.
 

How do you balance providing guidance with allowing founders to exercise autonomy?

We offer guidance and support in areas where we have expertise, establish clear communication channels, and set expectations upfront about our involvement and support. We respect the founders’ decision-making authority and do not get involved in the operational aspects of the business.

How do macroeconomic factors and relatively nascent capital markets influence the probability and timing of exits?  

Global economic uncertainties, including geopolitical tensions and trade policy shifts, have led to cautious investor sentiment. This environment has resulted in extended holding periods for investments, as suitable exit opportunities become scarce. 

High global interest rates and a strong US dollar have intensified fiscal pressures, particularly in emerging markets. These conditions have increased the cost of dollar-denominated debt, limiting fiscal expansion and affecting the attractiveness of exits. 

 In regions with underdeveloped capital markets, the lack of maturity hampers large-scale tech IPOs. This limitation restricts exit options for investors, often leading to prolonged investment durations.

What can founders do early in their growth to position themselves for successful exits?

Given longer timelines to profitability, founders should prioritise sustainable unit economics and disciplined financial management from the start. Navigating complex regulations is essential. Engaging with policymakers early and ensuring compliance can reduce roadblocks that deter potential acquirers or investors.

Political and economic instability can impact valuations and exit opportunities. Founders should build adaptable business models that can withstand external shocks and remain attractive to investors.

Strengthening internal capabilities in key areas like software development and tech management is crucial. Investing in talent development and attracting experienced leadership can accelerate growth and improve scalability.

Founders should proactively engage with potential acquirers, strategic partners, and later-stage investors to align on long-term exit pathways, whether through M&A, secondary sales, or public markets.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

African investment professionals earn 33% less than global counterparts due to smaller ecosystem

Published

on

By

African investment professionals earn less than their global counterparts due to the smaller assets and funds they manage, according to data on salaries and assets under management in African investment firms by Dream VC, a venture capital institute, and A&A Collective, a global investment community. 

The average annual salary for analysts at Africa-focused venture capital, private equity, and impact investment firms is $21,000. Outside Africa, that salary jumps by 33% to $28,000. At more senior levels, the gap widens—investment managers or principals outside Africa earn $40,000 more than a principal in Africa. 

The African investment salary gap can be explained by the size of assets under management (AUM) by African funds, with the average firm managing around $87.5 million for private equity (PE) funds. Most venture capital (VC) funds manage only $50 million, while impact investment funds manage $58 million. This pales compared to global counterparts like Asia, where the average VC fund size is $324 million.

“This report brings much-needed transparency to compensation, strengthening the industry for both emerging and established investors,” Mark Kleyner, the co-CEO of Dream VC, told TechCabal about the report, which pulled data from 209 participants across 28 African countries.

Investment firms pay salaries and other operating costs out of fund management fees. Venture capital firms, which account for two-thirds of the firms sampled, charge a 2% annual management fee on the fund size, leaving 80% of the capital for deployment. If a VC firm raises a $25 million fund, it earns $5 million in management fees over a typical 10-year fund cycle.

With the median AUM by African investment firms at $50 million, most firms operate with a $1 million annual operating budget, directly causing the salary gap. This disparity risks triggering a brain drain, as investment professionals seek better-paying opportunities abroad, further shrinking the pool of experienced talent in Africa. 

African funds may need to align compensation more closely with global benchmarks to retain leadership and expertise, especially as the ecosystem is younger than more mature markets and needs more experienced professionals. This may be possible in coming years as Africa’s ecosystem continues growing. In 2017, fifteen firms were founded for the first time; by 2022, that number had grown to 25. 

Besides the young firms, Africa’s investment sector is also dominated by young professionals, with 73% under 34 and 42% aged 25–29, reflecting an industry that is packed with emerging talent. Entry-level roles like Analysts (19%) and Associates (24%) are prevalent, while senior positions such as Principals (6%) and Directors (4%) are fewer. This imbalance shows the need for more African fund managers to strengthen and expand the ecosystem.

Given how young the average professional is, it’s not surprising that over half of investment professionals hold bachelor’s degrees, while 40% have master’s degrees, including 15% with MBAs. Only 39% of professionals have studied abroad, highlighting the demand for local market knowledge—a competitive edge in Africa’s cross-border investment landscape.

Carry—an investor’s share of investment profits—remains elusive for most professionals in Africa’s investment sector. Only senior roles like principals and portfolio managers receive meaningful equity, with a maximum carry of 10%, though the average remains low at 0.016% for principals. This contrasts with global norms, where carry is a key retention tool. 

Data around compensation among African employers and employees remain scarce, and with the report, the research team “sought to create a benchmarking study that could support salary transparency and help fund managers understand industry norms for compensation.”. 

The data, Kleyner said, would also help firms “professionalise Africa’s investment landscape”—a necessity as global capital flows into the continent’s tech hubs like Lagos, Nairobi, and Accra. 

You can read the full report for more context on the African investment salary gap here

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Kenyan digital lender Whitepath fined $2,000 for unlawful data use in second privacy violation

Published

on

By

Kenya’s Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC)  has fined digital lender Whitepath KES 250,000 ($2,000) for violating data privacy laws. Court records show that the regulator found that Whitepath, which operates Instarcash and Zuricash loan apps, listed an individual as a guarantor without their consent and subjected them to debt collection calls after the borrower defaulted. 

The fine—the company’s second in two years—adds to growing regulatory pressure on Kenyan digital lenders, who are scrutinized for aggressive debt collection tactics and mishandling customer data.

According to court documents seen by TechCabal, Dennis Caleb Owuor received an unexpected debt collection call from a Whitepath representative in November 2024. The caller claimed Owuor was listed as a guarantor for a defaulting borrower, despite Owuor having no prior agreement to such an arrangement. When he questioned the claim, the caller failed to provide any justification but continued to demand repayment. Despite Owuor’s instructions to stop, the calls persisted, prompting him to escalate the matter to the ODPC, alleging illegal privacy breaches and harassment.

Whitepath failed to respond to the regulator’s inquiries, but  Kenya’s Data Protection Act allows enforcement regardless. The ODPC ruled that Whitepath had no legal basis to process the complainant’s data, as listing someone as a guarantor requires explicit consent— which was never obtained. The company also violated data protection laws by failing to notify them that their data was being used.

In addition to the fine, the regulator directed Whitepath to erase the complainant’s data and provide proof of compliance. 

This is not Whitepath’s first data privacy violation. In April 2023, the ODPC fined the lender KES 5 million ($39,000) after nearly 150 complaints alleging unauthorised access to borrowers’ contact lists and sending unsolicited messages. The penalty came after Whitepath ignored an earlier enforcement notice. 

Whitepath did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

The case highlights ongoing regulatory action against digital lenders using unethical data practices, including extracting contact details from borrowers’ phones, sharing debtor information publicly, and employing aggressive collection tactics.

While enforcement is increasing, concerns remain over whether current penalties are sufficient. A KES 250,000 ($2000) penalty may not significantly deter a firm that disregarded a KES 5 million fine in 2023. Stronger regulatory measures, including larger fines and criminal liability for repeat offenders, may be required to ensure compliance and protect consumer rights.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

After P2P trading, hybrid finance apps are taking off in Nigeria’s crypto space

Published

on

By

As cryptocurrency adoption grows in Nigeria, founders are building hybrid finance apps to simplify access to crypto. These hybrid apps reduce the education barrier and overwhelming user experience flows common in crypto trading apps, allowing users to interact with cryptocurrency as easily as they do with fiat money on their traditional mobile banking apps.

Hybrid finance apps integrate traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralised finance (DeFi) features that allow users to buy, sell, or convert crypto to Naira without the need for an escrow or peer-to-peer (P2P) trading. Since mid-2023, startups like Taja, Palremit, Prestmit, Azasend, and Pandar have sprung up to create these hybrid solutions to enable more Nigerians to take part in the crypto sector. At least 20 such startups currently operate this hybrid finance model in Nigeria.

“I’ve only used Bybit when I had small amounts of Dogecoin and Bitcoin in my wallets,” said David Ayankoso, a non-frequent crypto user based in Lagos. “I find the process of exchanging crypto on Bybit to be complicated. The app is overloaded and not as simple as some other platforms. So instead, I buy Solana or Bitcoin elsewhere [on hybrid finance apps] and transfer it to my Phantom wallet to buy or trade random altcoins.”

Nigeria is one of the hotspots for crypto adoption globally, yet that high transaction value is only spread among a few knowledgeable people in the Web3 space. Sending and receiving crypto doesn’t quite work like fiat currencies in traditional banks. With one wrong click, funds are prone to losses, and bank accounts to freezes, making many Nigerians averse to digital assets.

The pitches of these hybrid finance startups often go like this: if you’re not familiar with the crypto P2P trading setup, use a hybrid finance app to avoid overwhelming yourself with the process of dealing with an escrow—or worse, getting scammed. Users simply open an account, gain access to a virtual account (a service hybrid finance apps provide through partnerships with payment processors), fund the account, and buy crypto directly from the app.

“Founders who build these apps see an opportunity to take advantage of a ‘grassroot movement’,” said Ayo Adewuyi, head of product at Prestmit, who claims the startup has over 700,000 users, thanks to additional features like gift card trading which attracts users from several countries. “For example, one of the reasons Patricia [one of the earliest to use this model] was an important crypto hybrid app was because people saw it as a Nigerian brand that wanted to localise crypto. Founders saw this and tapped into it.”

The clampdown on P2P trading and the strict regulatory oversight on big crypto exchanges paved a way for hybrid apps to thrive, said Adewuyi. He claimed Prestmit’s users grew significantly after large crypto exchanges deprioritised the Nigerian market.

While hybrid finance apps are not new, there is a growing focus on integrating crypto payment options into traditional finance systems. Beyond buying crypto for investment holdings, these apps let users manage digital assets like local currencies. They can pay bills, buy airtime and data, trade gift cards, send crypto directly to others through app tags, and pay for online services with crypto. Hybrid finance apps are also important to freelancers who earn in crypto, allowing them to convert to their local currency without relying on the P2P space.

Unlike building a crypto trading app, for example, operating a hybrid finance model is a much simpler setup. These startups provide three key things: the platform (proprietary technology like an app or a web-app), virtual accounts for user account management, and crypto liquidity.

Imagine walking into a mom-and-pop shop in your neighbourhood. With cash in hand—your local currency—you ask the storekeeper to sell you a crypto asset, say Bitcoin. The storekeeper collects your money, and two things could happen: either they process your order as the counterparty because they have the means, or they use a back-door service to obtain the required amount of crypto to sell to you. Either way, the hybrid app remains the counterparty to every trade. Most of these apps rely on crypto infrastructure providers to enable users to buy and sell crypto, while some outsource liquidity to over-the-counter (OTC) traders and institutions that provide bulk crypto liquidity.

“Liquidity is not manufactured out of thin air; liquidity providers, in some cases, are the P2P guys just that in this case, they go through a much more rigorous KYC process because startups want to be sure that the funds they are receiving are not illegal,” said Adewuyi.

The result of this outsourced liquidity often means that users have to play by the rules of the providers. Most liquidity providers cap the minimum amount of crypto users can buy or sell, which can be a bad experience for people buying or exchanging small amounts. For example, Luno, which can be considered a hybrid startup, allows users to offload their Bitcoin liquidity from 0.000025 BTC ($2.03), which means users cannot sell or off-ramp their coins below this amount. Some apps set the minimum crypto sell-off amount higher.

Since hybrid finance apps primarily make money from transaction fees, the costs are higher compared to trading platforms. Users get charged a percentage of their deposits on some of these platforms, and when they try to exchange, they do so at a higher, marked-up rate than the official exchange rate. In P2P trading apps, where liquidity is provided by traders who are directly responsible for their revenue, competition drives down prices.

“A lot of people are not interested in the complex part of crypto, and hybrid apps come in here. They provide the liquidity that users need at a specific rate, and if you’re fine with it, you go through with the transaction,” said Adewuyi.

Yet, hybrid finance apps pitch their tent on the value they provide—insurance from the risk factor found in trading apps—while extracting a few dollars in charges from customers. In the grand scheme of things, many of them do not operate as crypto exchanges, eliminating token listing fees as a possible revenue source.

Despite their dual nature, most so-called hybrid finance apps tilt more toward their traditional finance side than crypto, qualifying them more as fintechs than crypto startups. With this distinction, they are more bound by fintech rules than by the rules governing crypto startups in Nigeria’s evolving regulatory structure.

The broader trend has seen TradFi platforms integrate DeFi solutions into their products in attempts to find a balance. Uganda’s Eversend and Nigeria’s Grey, two traditional cross-border fintechs, have integrated stablecoin payments into their apps to appeal to Web3 freelancers who earn money in digital assets.

Hybrid finance apps are products of founders’ conviction that onboarding users into the utility side of crypto—as everyday money—is the future-forward way digital assets are developing. It also suggests that P2P, despite its faults, has no shortage of admirers who make crypto an insider affair. These apps are responses of founders for all those who feel left out.

Continue Reading

Trending